The Uses of Disgrace

 clinton..jpg

 By Mona Charen, National Review Online, November 15, 2017

In 1983, two congressmen, one a Democrat and the other a Republican, were censured by the House. Both had admitted to having affairs with 17-year-old pages. The Republican, Daniel Crane, represented a conservative Illinois district. His constituents sent him packing the following year, despite his apology and request for forgiveness.

The Democrat was Gerry Studds, who represented a liberal Massachusetts district. His relationship had been with a young man. He admitted to a “very serious error in judgment,” but seemed to imply that he was owed more latitude because he was gay. “It is not a simple task for any of us to meet adequately the obligations of either public office or private life, let alone both,” Studds said in an address to the House. “But these challenges are made substantially more complex when one is, as I am, both an elected public official and gay.” He was reelected seven more times and retired voluntarily in 1997.

At the time, conservatives saw the congressmen’s differing fates as symbolic of a difference between the parties. Sure, we conceded, there are bad apples everywhere, but the way they are received tells you something about their constituents. Do they bend the rules when one of their own is caught in a transgression? And how do you define what a transgression really is?  READ it HERE


Showing 1 reaction

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • anonymous
    commented 2018-02-16 06:06:41 -0600
    You really make it look like so easy with your production but I find this subject to be really amazing which I think I would never appreciate. It seems too difficult and awfully broad for me. I am looking forward for your next post, I will try to get the suspend of it!
    https://www.assignmentsolution.co.uk/write-my-assignment